(TeaParty.org Exclusive) – Natural immunity is and has always been far superior to any man-made vaccines. This has been settled science for decades yet in the post-COVID era even settled science is up for debate when it goes against the COVID narrative.
Yet another study has been done on natural immunity and the results are the same as the 91 other studies that have been conducted. The latest, a study by the Yale School of Public Health, has come to the conclusion that natural immunity is superior to the vaccines in protecting against COVID-19.
Nonetheless, the federal and state governments are sticking to their guns and insisting all Americans take the jab.
“We should not force COVID vaccines on anyone when the evidence shows that naturally acquired immunity is equal to or more robust and superior to existing vaccines. Instead, we should respect the right of the bodily integrity of individuals to decide for themselves,” Dr. Paul Elias Alexander, who compiled the 91 other studies, writes for the Brownstone Institute.
He is a former assistant professor at McMaster University in Hamilton, Ontario, in evidence-based medicine and research methods; a former adviser to WHO-PAHO in Washington, D.C., and a former senior adviser for COVID pandemic policy at Health and Human Services.
Alexander went as far as to charge Big Pharma, the media, and public health officials of “misleading the public with assertions that the COVID-19 shots provide greater protection than natural immunity.”
He cited CDC Director Rochelle Walensky who said in October 2020 in a statement published by the British journal The Lancet that “there is no evidence for lasting protective immunity to SARS-CoV-2 following natural infection” and “the consequence of waning immunity would present a risk to vulnerable populations for the indefinite future.”
However, “for more than a century, it’s been known that natural immunity confers protection against a respiratory virus’s outer coat proteins. And there is strong evidence for the persistence of antibodies,” writes WND.
Alexander even highlights this by pointing out that the CDC recognizes natural immunity for chicken-pox, measles, mumps, and rubella but conveniently not for COVID-19.
Alexander compiled the list of 91 studies with the help of Dr. Harvey Risch of the Yale School of Public Health, Dr. Howard Tenenbaum of the University of Toronto, Dr. Ramin Oskoui of Foxhall Cardiology in Washington D.C., Dr. Peter McCullough of the Truth for Health Foundation in Texas and medical consultant Dr. Parvez Dara.
All of these individuals are highly trained and educated experts, qualified to speak on these matters but because their professional conclusions are different from the mainstream COVID narrative, they’re disregarded.
They are not alone. On Tuesday, Johns Hopkins University’s Dr. Marty Makary said his “research team is leading a long-term study of natural immunity because the NIH and CDC are not doing it.”
“They have $50 billion and 30,000 employees and yet can’t seem to conduct one of the most important studies we need done to inform the public,” he wrote on Twitter.
My Johns Hopkins research team is leading a long-term study of natural immunity because the NIH and CDC are not doing it. They have $50 billion and 30,000 employees and yet can’t seen to conduct one of the most important studies we need done to inform the public.
— Marty Makary MD, MPH (@MartyMakary) October 27, 2021
It’s no coincidence that the CDC isn’t exactly rushing to do any studies concerning COVID-19 natural immunity. They’re in the business of pushing the vaccine and anything that would hinder that is off the table.
Copyright 2021. TeaParty.org
href>