Supreme Court Considers Case Challenging American Election Results

(TeaParty.org Exclusive) – Ever since the 2020 presidential election, Americans have been demanding that a court take seriously the charges of voter fraud and the evidence that supports the claims, launching some kind of investigation into these matters to ensure the integrity of our voting system. Unfortunately, most courts and legal professionals have simply waved it all away, ignoring the facts that have been presented which strongly suggest some form of fraud happened during the election that helped Joe Biden become the next president.

Well, Bob Unruh of WND is now saying a lawsuit that makes the allegation American election results were tampered with and could potentially overturn them is on its way to a conference in the U.S. Supreme Court in a matter of weeks. It’s important to point out that the lawsuit does not allege the 2020 election was stolen.

It claims, “that a large majority of Congress, by failing to investigate such serious allegations of election rigging and breaches of national security, violated their oaths to protect and defend the Constitution against all enemies, foreign and domestic,” according to a piece from the Gateway Pundit.

“A guest report at the website by Tim Canova explains the little-known case, Brunson v. Adams, was filed by four brothers from Utah, acting as their own counsel, and it actually seeks the ‘removal of President Biden and Vice President Harris, along with 291 U.S. Representatives and 94 U.S. Senators who voted to certify the Electors to the Electoral College on January 6, 2021 without first investigating serious allegations of election fraud in half a dozen states and foreign election interference and breach of national security in the 2020 presidential election,’” Unruh wrote.

It declared, “The outcome of such relief would presumably be to restore Donald Trump to the presidency.”

The report then went on to explain that the “national security interests” implicated the allegations allowed it to get passed the appeals court and move right up to the Supreme Court, “which has now scheduled a hearing for January 6, 2023.”

It then revealed that only four justices are needed to move the Petition for a Writ of Certiorari forward.

Canova stated, “It seems astounding that the court would wade into such waters two years to the day after the congressional vote to install Joe Biden as President. But these are not normal times. Democrats may well push legislation in this month’s lame duck session of Congress to impose term limits and a mandatory retirement age for justices, and thereby open the door to packing the court. Such a course would seem to be clear violations of Article III, Section 1 of the Constitution which provides that Justices ‘shall hold their Offices during good Behavior.’”

His piece also pointed out the threats might be providing additional incentive for the justices to review the cases as a “shield to deter any efforts by the lame duck Congress to infringe on the court’s independence.”

“The issue is a serious one for America’s democracy, being the violation by public officials of their constitutional oath of office ‘by rubber-stamping electors on Jan. 6th without first conducting any investigation of serious allegations of election fraud and foreign election interference,’” Unruh said.

Unruh noted in the story that the FBI was colluding with several major social media companies at the time to help bury headlines about the Biden family just a few days prior to the election. It referred to that as “a most egregious First Amendment violation intended to rig the election outcome and perhaps to install an unaccountable and criminal puppet government.”

“Supreme Court Justices may well see these approaching storm clouds and conclude that the Court’s intervention is necessary to prevent larger civil unrest resulting from constitutional violations that are undermining public trust and confidence in the outcomes of both the 2020 and 2022 elections. When criminals break the law — state and federal statutes — to rig an election, we are dependent on prosecutions by law enforcement agencies that have sadly become politicized and complicit. When they break the Constitution — the supreme law of the land — to rig an election, the only recourse may be the Supreme Court or military tribunals,” the report stated.

It then points out that Congress was placed on notice before the Jan. 6, 2021 vote by “more than a hundred of its own members detailing serious allegations of election frauds and calling for creation of an electoral commission to investigate the allegations.”

All the American people care about is being told the truth. We just want to know if the election was impacted by fraud. If it was, we want measures to be taken to prevent this sort of thing from ever happening in the future. The survival of our republic is dependent upon whether or not folks are allowed to vote for the candidate of their choice and to know their voice matters. Hopefully that’s what the Supreme Court will do in this instance.

Copyright 2022. TeaParty.org

Join The Uprisinghref>